Arcaveli Enterprise · now installing for law firms

Own your paralegal.

Not a seat. Not a subscription to someone else's chatbot. A private AI paralegal that lives inside your firm's own email, calendar, and files, and never clocks out. It reads the mail, files what came in, drafts the replies, sends the routine ones, builds the documents, and calendars the deadlines. Installed by us. Run by you. Yours when we leave.

Runs under your firm's own accounts · Sends only what you've authorized · Live in two weeks

One email, start to finish · live

0filed
0drafted
0sent
0held for you
InboxEvery message that reaches the firm, read within minutes, day or night.
Last night, at one firm
Filed 2 medical records → Smith v. Jones Drafted reply to opposing counsel Sent 3 scheduling acknowledgments Built an engagement letter from intake Calendared hearing · Nov 12 Computed response deadline · Oct 29 Flagged a privileged thread for the attorney Filed signed engagement letter → Rodriguez Summarized a 48-page deposition Caught a discovery date nobody had calendared Left 1 item in "unsure" instead of guessing
Always on

It doesn't wait to be asked.

Every message is a trigger. This is what one looks like going through, as it happens.

YOUR PARALEGAL · LIVE 1 agent · 0 errors
›Received: "Re: Smith v. Jones — deposition dates" from opposing counsel
ACTIONS THIS MONTH
1,247
HELD FOR REVIEW
38
ERRORS
0
RUNS ON
Your Claude seat · Your Google
Activity · just nowrun_a19e4c
Receipts

Every step, timed and logged.

One email's run, span by span. Drag the timeline. This is the audit trail a managing partner gets for every action it takes.

Re: Smith v. Jones — deposition datesrun_a19e4cclaude · your firm's seat
0ms / 0ms
Why now

Your staff already use AI. You just don't own it.

The numbers from the profession's own surveys. The question isn't whether AI touches your client matters. It's whose account it runs under.

63%
of paralegals already use AI at work
State Bar of Texas, 2026
50%
of firms have no AI policy at all
State Bar of Texas, 2026
$134/hr
what firms bill for paralegal time
NALA, 2024
11 hrs
a week of paralegal time that never gets billed
NALA, 29 billable of 40
Rent vs. own

Three ways to put AI on a client matter.

Only one of them is yours.

Criterion A ChatGPT seat An AI SaaS tool Arcaveli Enterprise
Who does the work Whoever types Whoever types It does, around the clock
Where client data lives Their servers Their servers Your Google or Microsoft
Whose account it runs under An employee's The vendor's Your firm's
Sends mail on its own n/a Anything, or nothing Routine mail yes, substantive waits
Knows your matters and folders No If you configure it We configure it with you
Written firm AI policy Your problem Your problem Included in the engagement
If you cancel It's gone It's gone It keeps running
What owning it means

It's yours. Literally.

The seats are in your name. The accounts are yours. The playbook is licensed to you.

We are the people who set it up and keep it tuned. There is no Arcaveli server between you and your paralegal.

Your Claude seats

Billed by Anthropic to your firm under commercial terms. No markup, no reselling, no middleman that can disappear.

Your Google or Microsoft

It works inside the accounts you already have. Nothing is copied anywhere. Nothing is stored at Arcaveli.

Your rules

The never-do list, folder names, voice, deadline rules. Written on the onboarding call. Changed by replying to an email.

Your audit trail

Every action in the morning digest. Every instruction from an address on your domain. Nothing from outside is ever a command.

Cancel us. It keeps running.

The retainer buys monitoring, tuning, and a phone number. Not permission. If you stop paying, the paralegal you own still shows up at six.

What it does

Not a drafter. A paralegal that never clocks out.

It is always on. It does the work, not the suggesting. You read a digest and sign.

This morning's digest · Smith v. Jones

Filed

Medical records (48 pp) → Smith v. Jones / Records

06:02 · 2 documents from Baptist Health

Drafted

Reply to opposing counsel re: deposition dates

06:04 · waiting in Drafts for your review

Calendared

Hearing Nov 12 · response due Oct 29

06:05 · tentative until you accept

Triage

Reads every new email, matches it to a matter, pulls out the dates, and decides: attorney, draft, or just file.

File

Attachments land in the right matter folder in Drive, OneDrive, or SharePoint, named the way your firm names things.

Draft

Replies and letters in your voice, from your own past correspondence, saved into the right thread.

Send

Routine mail goes out on its own: scheduling, acknowledgments, document requests. Substantive mail waits for you.

Documents

Engagement letters, demand letters, discovery responses, chronologies. Built from your templates and the matter file.

Calendar

Hearing dates, response deadlines computed from your rules, reminders. Tentative until you accept.

Intake

New leads get a reply, an intake form, a conflict check against your matters, and a folder before you see them.

Digest

One email at 6:30 with what came in, what it did, what it sent, what is waiting, and what it was unsure about.

A day with it

You review and sign. Same as with any paralegal.

Routine work goes out on its own. Judgment calls wait for yours. Click the card or a step to move through the morning.

02:14

Mail arrives. Nobody is awake.

Opposing counsel sends a motion. A client forwards 48 pages of medical records. The court sends a hearing notice. All three hit the firm inbox between midnight and six.

06:02

Filed to the matter. Deadline on the calendar.

The records go to Smith v. Jones / Records, named your way. The hearing lands on the attorney's calendar as tentative, with the response deadline computed from your court rules.

06:04

A reply, in your voice, waiting in Drafts.

Written from how you have answered opposing counsel before, in the right thread. It is substantive, so it waits for a human. Routine mail from the same run, like the acknowledgment to the client, already went out from the assistant's own address.

06:30

One email. Read it with coffee.

What came in, what was filed, which drafts are waiting, which deadlines were added, and one item it wasn't sure about. Reply "that's Garcia, file it there" and it does.

Work product

What lands on your desk by 6:30.

Hover a card. Everything here is a draft or a proposal until an attorney says so.

Draft replyreview
Re: deposition dates

Our client is available November 4 or 6. Please confirm which date works and we will circulate a notice.

Smith v. Jones · in Drafts
Chronologyreview
Medical timeline

03/02 ER visit, lumbar strain · 03/09 MRI, L4-L5 herniation · 04/14 PT begins · 06/30 referral to ortho.

48 pages → 11 entries, each cited
Deadlinetentative
Response due Oct 29

Computed from service on Oct 19 under the firm's rule for motions to compel. Added to the attorney's calendar as tentative.

Smith v. Jones · calendar
Fileddone
2 records, filed

2026-10-20 Baptist Health records.pdf and billing.pdf, placed in Smith v. Jones / Records with the firm's naming convention.

Drive · no action needed
Draftreview
Engagement letter

Prepared for Rodriguez from the firm template, fee schedule and scope filled from the intake form. Ready to send for signature.

Rodriguez · canvas
Draftreview
Discovery responses

First-pass responses and objections to 24 interrogatories, each mapped to the documents in the matter folder.

Smith v. Jones · needs attorney
Flagunsure
Which matter?

"Re: closing docs" from an unknown address. Left unfiled rather than guessed. One reply from you teaches it the sender for good.

digest · needs you
Filing

Every attachment lands in the right matter.

The assistant learns your folder structure and naming convention on the onboarding call and never deviates from it.

Smith v. Jones 4 items
Garcia Estate 3 items
New intake 2 items

Hover a folder. Click to open it.

"Arcaveli was the first AI tool our compliance team approved for client work."

Milena Mitraud — Mitraud Law

Safeguards

Built so a managing partner can sleep.

Every guardrail is enforced somewhere the model cannot reach, not by asking it nicely.

It sends only what you let it

Outbound from its mailbox is limited at the mail server to the classes you approve: scheduling, acknowledgments, document requests. Anything substantive waits in the review tray. The rule lives in Google Workspace or Exchange, not in a prompt.

An attorney reviews everything

Drafts wait for review. Calendar events stay tentative until accepted. The same supervision you already give a paralegal, written into the engagement.

Your accounts, your data

It runs under your firm's own Claude seats and your own Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. Nothing is stored at Arcaveli. Cancel us and it keeps running.

Instructions only from your firm

Email from outside the firm is data to be filed, never a command to be followed. Only addresses on your domain can tell it what to do.

How the engagement works

You never touch a server, a setting, or a prompt.

We do the installation the way an IT firm sets up your email. You show up to two calls.

1

Discovery call

Forty-five minutes. We look at a real week of your inbox, your folder structure, and ten emails with the replies you actually sent. You tell us what it must never do.

2

Setup and shadow week

We configure the seats, the connections, the send-block, and the playbook. It runs for a week where only you see the output. Two twenty-minute check-ins to correct it.

3

Live, and yours

Drafts to Drafts, deadlines tentative, digest every morning. We monitor that it ran, tune the playbook as your firm changes, and answer the phone. The setup stays yours either way.

A setup fee, then a monthly retainer.

Your firm pays Anthropic directly for its Claude seats, so there is no markup on the model and no usage surprise from us. We quote after the discovery call. The call itself is free.

Book a demo
Questions

What firms ask on the first call.

The Claude seats, in your firm's name. The assistant mailbox and its connections, in your Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. The scheduled tasks that run it. And a license to the playbook we wrote for you. If you end the retainer, all of that stays in place and keeps working. What you lose is us watching it, tuning it, and picking up the phone.

Yes, for the routine classes you approve on the onboarding call: scheduling replies, acknowledgments, document requests, intake responses. Those go out from the assistant's own address, and the mail server limits that address to exactly those classes, so a confused model cannot widen its own permissions. Anything substantive, anything to a court, anything touching privilege, lands in the review tray and goes out only when an attorney sends it.

Exactly where it lives today: in your Google Workspace or Microsoft 365. The assistant reads it through your firm's own Claude account under Anthropic's commercial terms, which exclude training on your data. Arcaveli stores none of it. We never hold a copy of your email, your files, or your calendar.

Both. Gmail, Google Calendar, and Drive on one side; Outlook, Outlook Calendar, OneDrive, and SharePoint on the other. Personal gmail.com and outlook.com accounts are not supported, because a firm's own domain is what makes the safeguards possible.

Every action appears in the morning digest, so a misfile is visible the same day and takes one reply to correct. Anything it is unsure about it leaves in an "unsure" list rather than guessing. During the shadow week we tune the matter-matching against your real mail until misfiles are rare.

No. You need whoever administers your email to join a thirty-minute call and click where we point. After that, the assistant is controlled by replying to its digest or emailing it in plain English.

ChatGPT waits for someone to type. This reads the inbox at six in the morning and has the work done before anyone sits down. It also runs under your firm's accounts with a hard send-block and a daily audit trail, which is what lets a managing partner approve it for client matters.

Stop renting a chatbot. Own the paralegal.

One call. We look at a week of your inbox and tell you exactly what it would have done.

Book a demo

See it run on a week of your own mail.

Forty-five minutes with the founder. No deck. We walk through what the assistant would have done with last week's inbox and leave you with a written scope and a quote.

  • We reply within one business day to schedule.
  • Bring your office manager or whoever runs your email.
  • Nothing is installed and nothing is shared before you say so.

Or email hello@arcaveli.com. We don't add you to a list.

Got it.

We'll reply within one business day with times for the call. Check your inbox, and your spam folder once, just in case.